If you were drafting a 3-4 outside linebacker, or a 4-3 defensive
end, how much would you really care about their ability to stop the run,
if they were a hellacious pass rusher? You probably wouldn't care very
much. Guys who can stop the run are a dime a dozen. You could pick
one up in the fifth round without much difficulty. Teams struggle much
more with finding guys who can turn the opposing quarterback into a
paraplegic.
If you have read through the other nonsense
I have posted here, what I'm about to say will seem very predictable.
Teams should draft freak athletes! Look for guys who can jump really
high! Blah, blah, blah. I'm even bored with myself. Once again, we're
going to pull out the old
Kangaroo Score. The Kangaroo Score, in this case, relates to a player's ability to effectively bull rush and their explosiveness when the ball is snapped. There will also be a visit
from the Agility Score, and a special guest appearance by the often
neglected bench press. The bench press results from the combine don't
really matter too much, and will only represent 10% of a player's total
score. At some point I might get rid of the bench press altogether. It
really only serves to eliminate the freakishly weak.
First
of all, we'll look at the 3-4 outside linebackers. Generally speaking
they will be a bit more agile than 4-3 defensive ends. It should make
sense that a 3-4 outside linebacker would benefit from better agility,
since they will drop back into coverage with greater frequency than
defensive ends. Other than that, the differences are insignificant,
regardless of what stupid things people say about "Oh, he won't fit this
scheme". It's all nonsense. For the most part they are pretty
interchangeable. Basically, the lighter the player is, the more they
will require/benefit from increased agility, so as to avoid
offensive tackles who could maul them. I will also be including the player's average number
of tackles for a loss in their last 2 years in college. I'll explain why a
bit later.
3-4 Outside Linebackers
Player Weight Bench Kang. Score Agility Score Total Avg. TFL
Shawne Merriman | 272 | 25 | 1.960 | 0.506 | 1.351 | 13.25 |
Connor Barwin | 256 | 21 | 1.642 | 1.186 | 1.282 | 16 |
Brian Orakpo | 263 | 31 | 1.979 | -0.312 | 1.240 | 14 |
Justin Houston | 270 | 30 | 1.581 | 0.506 | 1.226 | 16.75 |
Cameron Wake | 236 | 20 | 1.371 | 0.843 | 0.996 | 8 |
Demarcus Ware | 251 | 27 | 0.759 | 1.529 | 0.979 | 17.25 |
Adalius Thomas | 270 | 24 | 1.573 | -0.306 | 0.855 | 18 |
Von Miller | 246 | 21 | 0.532 | 1.846 | 0.814 | 19.5 |
LaMarr Woodley | 266 | 29 | 1.195 | -0.075 | 0.800 | 15.25 |
Kamerion Wimbley | 248 | 24 | 1.008 | 0.143 | 0.651 | 8.25 |
Ryan Kerrigan | 267 | 31 | 0.805 | 0.007 | 0.632 | 22.25 |
Hmm, that sure is a lot of exceptional athletes there. I wonder if that
is a coincidence? Some difficult individuals might be tempted to
say,"Hey, why does Connor Barwin have a higher total score than Demarcus
Ware? That can't be right." These people are assholes, who want to
make my life difficult. Yes, you. The scores themselves don't really
matter that much, as odd as that may sound. All we care about is
whether a player crosses certain thresholds when it comes to being more explosive and agile than his
average peer. These guys are.. so shut up.
4-3 Defensive Ends
Player Weight Bench Kang. Score Agility Score Total Avg. TFL
Mario Williams | 295 | 35 | 3.123 | 0.005 | 2.104 | 19.5 |
JJ Watt | 290 | 34 | 2.308 | 1.084 | 1.918 | 18.25 |
Kyle Vanden Bosch | 270 | 26 | 1.211 | 1.559 | 1.238 | 14 |
Brian Robison | 259 | 27 | 1.383 | 0.926 | 1.172 | 12 |
Chris Long | 272 | 24 | 1.238 | 0.814 | 0.990 | 14.25 |
Will Smith | 275 | 30 | 1.629 | -0.454 | 0.967 | 16.25 |
Aaron Schobel | 263 | 21 | 1.098 | 1.043 | 0.912 | N/A |
Jevon Kearse | 262 | 24 | 1.083 | 0.769 | 0.883 | 10 |
Andre Carter | 249 | 20 | 1.230 | 0.577 | 0.831 | 19.5 |
Jason Babin | 260 | 28 | 0.492 | 0.988 | 0.677 | 29.5 |
Justin Tuck | 265 | 24 | 1.060 | -0.004 | 0.637 | 16.5 |
Robert Quinn | 265 | 22 | 0.968 | 0.076 | 0.565 | 12.75 |
Greg Hardy | 281 | 21 | 1.370 | -0.846 | 0.509 | 14.25 |
Rob Ninkovich | 260 | 23 | 0.267 | 1.013 | 0.446 | 13.25 |
What's that you say? These guys look pretty athletic too? Hmm, I'll
have to look into that. Surely it is just a coincidence. In some ways,
Brian Orakpo and
Adalius Thomas should fit in better here, since their
agility score were a bit lower. Some of these players like
Brian
Robison,
Kyle Vanden Bosch,
Chris Long, etc. would likewise probably
prove capable of playing quite well in a 3-4. People would shriek and squeal,"No,
Chris Long wouldn't fit in that scheme." Why not? He's about as agile
as Cameron Wake, and no heavier than
Shawne Merriman or
Justin Houston.
Jason Babin really should be in a 3-4, since he doesn't have great
explosive power, but has excellent agility. This might be why he
briefly thrived in the nonsensical "wide 9" defense in Philly. It let
him line up very wide outside the offensive tackle (similar to how he
would line up in a 3-4) and avoid some physical confrontations. The same
thought probably applies to
Rob Ninkovich.
Yes, J.J.
Watt is really a 3-4 defensive end, which is more like a defensive
tackle (sort of like Mario Williams who I also included), but I can't
resist posting his numbers everywhere I possibly can. They are amazing!
Yes,
this is leaving out quite a few guys who scored well, but who became
busts (it also leaves out some who were just "good"). This is why I include the Avg. TFL here. If you additionally
filter players who had a low number of TFL it eliminates most of the
athletic guys who became failures. In general, I sort guys like this. If
they have a total score over
0.500 and averaged 15 TFL in their
last two college years, they get a first round grade. Then the TFL
requirement goes down to 14 for the second round, 13 for the third,
etc. If you stick to that your likelihood of success should fall somewhere
between
65-82%, regardless of the round in which a player is taken. Of course, this does require pursuing players that the computer suggests are the most valuable targets, but these players are also frequently available later than you might suspect. The league-wide average success rate is somewhere between
20-30%.
The reason I give a range of percentages is because precisely defining success is tricky here, and this covers the strictest and loosest
possible definitions of the term that I can imagine. This is based on examining 702 linebackers and defensive ends, so sample size isn't really an issue. Once you get to the
third round, I think it is okay to start taking guys with total scores
between
0.300 and
0.500, but the TFL meter gets reset. So, 15 TFL for
the third round, 14 TFL for the fourth, etc.
So far, using this
system has only resulted in one potential first round pick who turned
out to be a bust. Unfortunately that player was
Vernon Gholston. What
can you do? On the flip side, the system does alert you to an undrafted player
like
Cameron Wake, as a very interesting prospect. I have no idea how
teams weren't interested in someone as athletically gifted as him. Sure, he wasn't very productive in college, but that sort of athleticism seems worth a late round pick.
Now
let's look at some of the stupidest moments in recent NFL history. Who were
some highly drafted players that haven't turned out to be worth much?
Player Weight Bench Kang. Score Agility Score Total Avg. TFL
Courtney Upshaw | 272 | 22 | -0.754 | -0.843 | -0.743 | 15.75 |
Brandon Graham | 268 | 31 | -0.120 | 0.722 | 0.291 | 23 |
Derrick Morgan | 266 | 21 | 0.225 | 0.012 | 0.079 | 14 |
Tyson Jackson | 296 | 20 | -0.022 | -2.013 | -0.696 | N/A |
Aaron Curry | 254 | 25 | 0.811 | -0.266 | 0.430 | 14.75 |
Aaron Maybin | 249 | 22 | 0.705 | -0.619 | 0.199 | 12.25 |
Larry English | 255 | 24 | -0.272 | -0.118 | -0.196 | 16.5 |
Robert Ayers | 272 | 17 | -0.811 | -1.056 | -0.944 | 13.75 |
Everette Brown | 256 | 26 | -0.459 | -1.092 | -0.559 | 16.5 |
Derrick Harvey | 271 | 31 | -0.320 | -0.082 | -0.070 | 15 |
Quentin Groves | 259 | 30 | 0.531 | -0.325 | 0.347 | 13 |
Jarvis Moss | 250 | 16 | -0.517 | -0.105 | -0.503 | 10 |
The guys in this group have two things in common.
They were all taken in the first two rounds, and they all suck.
Aaron Curry almost has a passable score, but almost passable isn't what you want to see in a first round pick. The computer would have viewed him as a 3rd rounder. While many of them had impressive statistical production in college (high TFL numbers, in this case), their physical measurables suggested that there was a reasonable likelihood that this dominance wouldn't continue at the NFL level. I also realize that it is awfully early to call
Courtney Upshaw a bust, but I'm willing to go out on limb with that hunch.
There is an additional category of pass rushers, that relies very heavily on high agility scores,
which I've now written about here. I'll also try to get into some of the weird pass rushing
outliers too.